mmc: core: Restore (almost) the busy polling for MMC_SEND_OP_COND
authorUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Fri, 4 Mar 2022 10:56:56 +0000 (11:56 +0100)
committerUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Mon, 7 Mar 2022 10:47:39 +0000 (11:47 +0100)
Commit 76bfc7ccc2fa ("mmc: core: adjust polling interval for CMD1"),
significantly decreased the polling period from ~10-12ms into just a couple
of us. The purpose was to decrease the total time spent in the busy polling
loop, but unfortunate it has lead to problems, that causes eMMC cards to
never gets out busy and thus fails to be initialized.

To fix the problem, but also to try to keep some of the new improved
behaviour, let's start by using a polling period of 1-2ms, which then
increases for each loop, according to common polling loop in
__mmc_poll_for_busy().

Reported-by: Jean Rene Dawin <jdawin@math.uni-bielefeld.de>
Reported-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com>
Cc: Huijin Park <huijin.park@samsung.com>
Fixes: 76bfc7ccc2fa ("mmc: core: adjust polling interval for CMD1")
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Jean Rene Dawin <jdawin@math.uni-bielefeld.de>
Tested-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220304105656.149281-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org
drivers/mmc/core/block.c
drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.h
drivers/mmc/core/sd.c

index 8d718aa..4e67c14 100644 (file)
@@ -1908,7 +1908,7 @@ static int mmc_blk_card_busy(struct mmc_card *card, struct request *req)
 
        cb_data.card = card;
        cb_data.status = 0;
-       err = __mmc_poll_for_busy(card->host, MMC_BLK_TIMEOUT_MS,
+       err = __mmc_poll_for_busy(card->host, 0, MMC_BLK_TIMEOUT_MS,
                                  &mmc_blk_busy_cb, &cb_data);
 
        /*
index bbbbcaf..8421519 100644 (file)
@@ -1962,7 +1962,7 @@ static int mmc_sleep(struct mmc_host *host)
                goto out_release;
        }
 
-       err = __mmc_poll_for_busy(host, timeout_ms, &mmc_sleep_busy_cb, host);
+       err = __mmc_poll_for_busy(host, 0, timeout_ms, &mmc_sleep_busy_cb, host);
 
 out_release:
        mmc_retune_release(host);
index d63d1c7..180d7e9 100644 (file)
@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
 
 #define MMC_BKOPS_TIMEOUT_MS           (120 * 1000) /* 120s */
 #define MMC_SANITIZE_TIMEOUT_MS                (240 * 1000) /* 240s */
+#define MMC_OP_COND_PERIOD_US          (1 * 1000) /* 1ms */
+#define MMC_OP_COND_TIMEOUT_MS         1000 /* 1s */
 
 static const u8 tuning_blk_pattern_4bit[] = {
        0xff, 0x0f, 0xff, 0x00, 0xff, 0xcc, 0xc3, 0xcc,
@@ -232,7 +234,9 @@ int mmc_send_op_cond(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr, u32 *rocr)
        cmd.arg = mmc_host_is_spi(host) ? 0 : ocr;
        cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_SPI_R1 | MMC_RSP_R3 | MMC_CMD_BCR;
 
-       err = __mmc_poll_for_busy(host, 1000, &__mmc_send_op_cond_cb, &cb_data);
+       err = __mmc_poll_for_busy(host, MMC_OP_COND_PERIOD_US,
+                                 MMC_OP_COND_TIMEOUT_MS,
+                                 &__mmc_send_op_cond_cb, &cb_data);
        if (err)
                return err;
 
@@ -495,13 +499,14 @@ static int mmc_busy_cb(void *cb_data, bool *busy)
        return 0;
 }
 
-int __mmc_poll_for_busy(struct mmc_host *host, unsigned int timeout_ms,
+int __mmc_poll_for_busy(struct mmc_host *host, unsigned int period_us,
+                       unsigned int timeout_ms,
                        int (*busy_cb)(void *cb_data, bool *busy),
                        void *cb_data)
 {
        int err;
        unsigned long timeout;
-       unsigned int udelay = 32, udelay_max = 32768;
+       unsigned int udelay = period_us ? period_us : 32, udelay_max = 32768;
        bool expired = false;
        bool busy = false;
 
@@ -546,7 +551,7 @@ int mmc_poll_for_busy(struct mmc_card *card, unsigned int timeout_ms,
        cb_data.retry_crc_err = retry_crc_err;
        cb_data.busy_cmd = busy_cmd;
 
-       return __mmc_poll_for_busy(host, timeout_ms, &mmc_busy_cb, &cb_data);
+       return __mmc_poll_for_busy(host, 0, timeout_ms, &mmc_busy_cb, &cb_data);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mmc_poll_for_busy);
 
index 9c813b8..09ffbc0 100644 (file)
@@ -41,7 +41,8 @@ int mmc_can_ext_csd(struct mmc_card *card);
 int mmc_switch_status(struct mmc_card *card, bool crc_err_fatal);
 bool mmc_prepare_busy_cmd(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd,
                          unsigned int timeout_ms);
-int __mmc_poll_for_busy(struct mmc_host *host, unsigned int timeout_ms,
+int __mmc_poll_for_busy(struct mmc_host *host, unsigned int period_us,
+                       unsigned int timeout_ms,
                        int (*busy_cb)(void *cb_data, bool *busy),
                        void *cb_data);
 int mmc_poll_for_busy(struct mmc_card *card, unsigned int timeout_ms,
index bd87012..bfbfed3 100644 (file)
@@ -1672,7 +1672,7 @@ static int sd_poweroff_notify(struct mmc_card *card)
 
        cb_data.card = card;
        cb_data.reg_buf = reg_buf;
-       err = __mmc_poll_for_busy(card->host, SD_POWEROFF_NOTIFY_TIMEOUT_MS,
+       err = __mmc_poll_for_busy(card->host, 0, SD_POWEROFF_NOTIFY_TIMEOUT_MS,
                                  &sd_busy_poweroff_notify_cb, &cb_data);
 
 out: