Waiting for seqno-1 in our object synchronization code is an
implementation detail given how we've decided to do the waits within the
rest of our code.
Requested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
}
- ret = to->sync_to(to, from, seqno - 1);
+ ret = to->sync_to(to, from, seqno);
if (!ret)
from->sync_seqno[idx] = seqno;
MI_SEMAPHORE_COMPARE |
MI_SEMAPHORE_REGISTER;
+ /* Throughout all of the GEM code, seqno passed implies our current
+ * seqno is >= the last seqno executed. However for hardware the
+ * comparison is strictly greater than.
+ */
+ seqno -= 1;
+
ret = intel_ring_begin(waiter, 4);
if (ret)
return ret;