+2013-05-22 Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
+
+ * elf/ldconfig.c (is_hwcap_platform): Make comments full setences.
+ (main): Mention "tls" pseudo-hwcap is legacy.
+ * elf/dl-hwcaps.c (_dl_important_hwcaps): Correct rounding comment.
+
2013-05-22 Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
* math/gen-libm-test.pl (parse_args): Output only string of
+ GLRO(dl_sysinfo_map)->l_addr);
/* The standard ELF note layout is exactly as the anonymous struct.
The next element is a variable length vendor name of length
- VENDORLEN (with a real length rounded to ElfW(Addr)), followed
+ VENDORLEN (with a real length rounded to ElfW(Word)), followed
by the data of length DATALEN (with a real length rounded to
- ElfW(Addr)). */
+ ElfW(Word)). */
const struct
{
ElfW(Word) vendorlen;
{
int hwcap_idx = _dl_string_hwcap (name);
- /* Is this a normal hwcap for the machine e.g. fpu? */
+ /* Is this a normal hwcap for the machine like "fpu?" */
if (hwcap_idx != -1 && ((1 << hwcap_idx) & hwcap_mask))
return 1;
- /* ... Or is it a platform pseudo-hwcap e.g. i686? */
+ /* Is this a platform pseudo-hwcap like "i686?" */
hwcap_idx = _dl_string_platform (name);
if (hwcap_idx != -1)
return 1;
- /* ... Or is this one of the extra pseudo-hwcaps that we map beyond
- _DL_FIRST_EXTRA e.g. tls, or nosegneg? */
+ /* Is this one of the extra pseudo-hwcaps that we map beyond
+ _DL_FIRST_EXTRA like "tls", or "nosegneg?" */
for (hwcap_idx = _DL_FIRST_EXTRA; hwcap_idx < 64; ++hwcap_idx)
if (hwcap_extra[hwcap_idx - _DL_FIRST_EXTRA] != NULL
&& !strcmp (name, hwcap_extra[hwcap_idx - _DL_FIRST_EXTRA]))
add_dir (argv[i]);
}
- /* The last entry in hwcap_extra is reserved for the "tls"
- pseudo-hwcap which indicates support for TLS. */
+ /* The last entry in hwcap_extra is reserved for the "tls" pseudo-hwcap which
+ indicates support for TLS. This pseudo-hwcap is only used by old versions
+ under which TLS support was optional. The entry is no longer needed, but
+ must remain for compatibility. */
hwcap_extra[63 - _DL_FIRST_EXTRA] = "tls";
set_hwcap ();