vulkan: Remove asserts that weren't valid for RADV ETC2 emulation.

Wasn't caught when radv was modified to use these helpers ...

Tried to move the aspects assert so it still checks application inputs.

Fixes: d9048e31a0d ("radv: Use vk_image_view as the base for radv_image_view")
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/19914>

diff --git a/src/vulkan/runtime/vk_image.c b/src/vulkan/runtime/vk_image.c
index e361d4a..6af5388 100644 (file)
--- a/src/vulkan/runtime/vk_image.c
+++ b/src/vulkan/runtime/vk_image.c
@@ -187,8 +187,6 @@ VkImageUsageFlags
 vk_image_usage(const struct vk_image *image,
                VkImageAspectFlags aspect_mask)
 {
-   assert(!(aspect_mask & ~image->aspects));
-
    /* From the Vulkan 1.2.131 spec:
     *
     *    "If the image was has a depth-stencil format and was created with
@@ -371,23 +369,14 @@ vk_image_view_init(struct vk_device *device,
    const VkImageSubresourceRange *range = &pCreateInfo->subresourceRange;
 
    if (driver_internal) {
-      /* For driver internal images, all we require is that the block sizes
-       * match.  Otherwise, we trust the driver to use a format it knows what
-       * to do with.  Combined depth/stencil images might not match if the
-       * driver only cares about one of the two aspects.
-       */
-      if (image->aspects == VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_COLOR_BIT ||
-          image->aspects == VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_DEPTH_BIT ||
-          image->aspects == VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_STENCIL_BIT) {
-         assert(vk_format_get_blocksize(image->format) ==
-                vk_format_get_blocksize(image_view->format));
-      }
       image_view->aspects = range->aspectMask;
       image_view->view_format = pCreateInfo->format;
    } else {
       image_view->aspects =
          vk_image_expand_aspect_mask(image, range->aspectMask);
 
+      assert(!(image_view->aspects & ~image->aspects));
+
       /* From the Vulkan 1.2.184 spec:
        *
        *    "If the image has a multi-planar format and