Don't rely on inferior I/O in gdb.base/restore.exp
authorPedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:09:37 +0000 (11:09 +0100)
committerPedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:09:37 +0000 (11:09 +0100)
There seems to be no point in relying on stdio here.  Simply use
gdb_continue_to_end instead.

(not removing the printf calls, as the .c file is half generated.)

gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2015-07-29  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>

* gdb.base/restore.exp (restore_tests): Use gdb_continue_to_end.

gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/restore.exp

index 8866884..1820b27 100644 (file)
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
 2015-07-29  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>
 
+       * gdb.base/restore.exp (restore_tests): Use gdb_continue_to_end.
+
+2015-07-29  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>
+
        * gdb.base/call-signal-resume.exp: Remove check for
        gdb,noinferiorio.  Don't expect "no signal".  Use gdb_test.
        * gdb.base/unwindonsignal.exp: Likewise.
index a02ba4f..bd9dfbf 100644 (file)
@@ -79,20 +79,7 @@ proc restore_tests { } {
         }
     }
 
-    if ![gdb_skip_stdio_test "run to completion"] {
-       send_gdb "continue\n"
-
-       gdb_expect {
-           -re "exiting" {
-               pass "run to completion"
-           }
-           timeout { 
-               fail "(timeout) run to completion"
-           }
-       }
-    } else {
-       gdb_test "continue" ".*" ""
-    }
+    gdb_continue_to_end "" continue 1
 }
 
 set prev_timeout $timeout