landlock: Refactor check_access_path_dual() into is_access_to_paths_allowed()
authorGünther Noack <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
Tue, 18 Oct 2022 18:22:07 +0000 (20:22 +0200)
committerMickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
Wed, 19 Oct 2022 07:01:43 +0000 (09:01 +0200)
Rename check_access_path_dual() to is_access_to_paths_allowed().

Make it return true iff the access is allowed.

Calculate the EXDEV/EACCES error code in the one place where it's needed.

Suggested-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018182216.301684-3-gnoack3000@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
security/landlock/fs.c

index 64ed766..277868e 100644 (file)
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ is_eacces(const layer_mask_t (*const layer_masks)[LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS],
 }
 
 /**
- * check_access_path_dual - Check accesses for requests with a common path
+ * is_access_to_paths_allowed - Check accesses for requests with a common path
  *
  * @domain: Domain to check against.
  * @path: File hierarchy to walk through.
@@ -465,14 +465,10 @@ is_eacces(const layer_mask_t (*const layer_masks)[LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS],
  * allow the request.
  *
  * Returns:
- * - 0 if the access request is granted;
- * - -EACCES if it is denied because of access right other than
- *   LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER;
- * - -EXDEV if the renaming or linking would be a privileged escalation
- *   (according to each layered policies), or if LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER is
- *   not allowed by the source or the destination.
+ * - true if the access request is granted;
+ * - false otherwise.
  */
-static int check_access_path_dual(
+static bool is_access_to_paths_allowed(
        const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain,
        const struct path *const path,
        const access_mask_t access_request_parent1,
@@ -492,17 +488,17 @@ static int check_access_path_dual(
        (*layer_masks_child2)[LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS] = NULL;
 
        if (!access_request_parent1 && !access_request_parent2)
-               return 0;
+               return true;
        if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!domain || !path))
-               return 0;
+               return true;
        if (is_nouser_or_private(path->dentry))
-               return 0;
+               return true;
        if (WARN_ON_ONCE(domain->num_layers < 1 || !layer_masks_parent1))
-               return -EACCES;
+               return false;
 
        if (unlikely(layer_masks_parent2)) {
                if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!dentry_child1))
-                       return -EACCES;
+                       return false;
                /*
                 * For a double request, first check for potential privilege
                 * escalation by looking at domain handled accesses (which are
@@ -513,7 +509,7 @@ static int check_access_path_dual(
                is_dom_check = true;
        } else {
                if (WARN_ON_ONCE(dentry_child1 || dentry_child2))
-                       return -EACCES;
+                       return false;
                /* For a simple request, only check for requested accesses. */
                access_masked_parent1 = access_request_parent1;
                access_masked_parent2 = access_request_parent2;
@@ -622,24 +618,7 @@ jump_up:
        }
        path_put(&walker_path);
 
-       if (allowed_parent1 && allowed_parent2)
-               return 0;
-
-       /*
-        * This prioritizes EACCES over EXDEV for all actions, including
-        * renames with RENAME_EXCHANGE.
-        */
-       if (likely(is_eacces(layer_masks_parent1, access_request_parent1) ||
-                  is_eacces(layer_masks_parent2, access_request_parent2)))
-               return -EACCES;
-
-       /*
-        * Gracefully forbids reparenting if the destination directory
-        * hierarchy is not a superset of restrictions of the source directory
-        * hierarchy, or if LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER is not allowed by the
-        * source or the destination.
-        */
-       return -EXDEV;
+       return allowed_parent1 && allowed_parent2;
 }
 
 static inline int check_access_path(const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain,
@@ -649,8 +628,10 @@ static inline int check_access_path(const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain,
        layer_mask_t layer_masks[LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS] = {};
 
        access_request = init_layer_masks(domain, access_request, &layer_masks);
-       return check_access_path_dual(domain, path, access_request,
-                                     &layer_masks, NULL, 0, NULL, NULL);
+       if (is_access_to_paths_allowed(domain, path, access_request,
+                                      &layer_masks, NULL, 0, NULL, NULL))
+               return 0;
+       return -EACCES;
 }
 
 static inline int current_check_access_path(const struct path *const path,
@@ -711,8 +692,9 @@ static inline access_mask_t maybe_remove(const struct dentry *const dentry)
  * file.  While walking from @dir to @mnt_root, we record all the domain's
  * allowed accesses in @layer_masks_dom.
  *
- * This is similar to check_access_path_dual() but much simpler because it only
- * handles walking on the same mount point and only checks one set of accesses.
+ * This is similar to is_access_to_paths_allowed() but much simpler because it
+ * only handles walking on the same mount point and only checks one set of
+ * accesses.
  *
  * Returns:
  * - true if all the domain access rights are allowed for @dir;
@@ -857,10 +839,11 @@ static int current_check_refer_path(struct dentry *const old_dentry,
                access_request_parent1 = init_layer_masks(
                        dom, access_request_parent1 | access_request_parent2,
                        &layer_masks_parent1);
-               return check_access_path_dual(dom, new_dir,
-                                             access_request_parent1,
-                                             &layer_masks_parent1, NULL, 0,
-                                             NULL, NULL);
+               if (is_access_to_paths_allowed(
+                           dom, new_dir, access_request_parent1,
+                           &layer_masks_parent1, NULL, 0, NULL, NULL))
+                       return 0;
+               return -EACCES;
        }
 
        access_request_parent1 |= LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER;
@@ -886,11 +869,27 @@ static int current_check_refer_path(struct dentry *const old_dentry,
         * parent access rights.  This will be useful to compare with the
         * destination parent access rights.
         */
-       return check_access_path_dual(dom, &mnt_dir, access_request_parent1,
-                                     &layer_masks_parent1, old_dentry,
-                                     access_request_parent2,
-                                     &layer_masks_parent2,
-                                     exchange ? new_dentry : NULL);
+       if (is_access_to_paths_allowed(
+                   dom, &mnt_dir, access_request_parent1, &layer_masks_parent1,
+                   old_dentry, access_request_parent2, &layer_masks_parent2,
+                   exchange ? new_dentry : NULL))
+               return 0;
+
+       /*
+        * This prioritizes EACCES over EXDEV for all actions, including
+        * renames with RENAME_EXCHANGE.
+        */
+       if (likely(is_eacces(&layer_masks_parent1, access_request_parent1) ||
+                  is_eacces(&layer_masks_parent2, access_request_parent2)))
+               return -EACCES;
+
+       /*
+        * Gracefully forbids reparenting if the destination directory
+        * hierarchy is not a superset of restrictions of the source directory
+        * hierarchy, or if LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER is not allowed by the
+        * source or the destination.
+        */
+       return -EXDEV;
 }
 
 /* Inode hooks */