Do not pass NULL to memcpy

-fsanitize=undefined pointed out a spot that passes NULL to memcpy,
which is undefined behavior according to the C standard.

gdb/ChangeLog
2018-10-03  Tom Tromey  <tom@tromey.com>

	* namespace.c (add_using_directive): Don't pass NULL to memcpy.

diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog
index f5448c3..1f8b8e5 100644 (file)
--- a/gdb/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2018-10-03  Tom Tromey  <tom@tromey.com>
+
+       * namespace.c (add_using_directive): Don't pass NULL to memcpy.
+
 2018-10-03  Philippe Waroquiers  <philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be>
 
        * tid-parse.c (tid_is_in_list): Fix wrong 'See' comment.

diff --git a/gdb/namespace.c b/gdb/namespace.c
index be998d9..85c0c4b 100644 (file)
--- a/gdb/namespace.c
+++ b/gdb/namespace.c
@@ -111,8 +111,9 @@ add_using_directive (struct using_direct **using_directives,
   else
     newobj->declaration = declaration;
 
-  memcpy (newobj->excludes, excludes.data (),
-         excludes.size () * sizeof (*newobj->excludes));
+  if (!excludes.empty ())
+    memcpy (newobj->excludes, excludes.data (),
+           excludes.size () * sizeof (*newobj->excludes));
   newobj->excludes[excludes.size ()] = NULL;
 
   newobj->next = *using_directives;