dev_err() statements are better to use than pr_err(), so switch to those.
In a similar vein, the check on the dev_req_params pointer here is not
needed, the two places this function is called never pass in a NULL
pointer, so instead of using dev_err() there just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Asutosh Das <quic_asutoshd@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
struct ufs_dev_params ufs_qcom_cap;
int ret = 0;
- if (!dev_req_params) {
- pr_err("%s: incoming dev_req_params is NULL\n", __func__);
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto out;
- }
-
switch (status) {
case PRE_CHANGE:
ufshcd_init_pwr_dev_param(&ufs_qcom_cap);
dev_max_params,
dev_req_params);
if (ret) {
- pr_err("%s: failed to determine capabilities\n",
+ dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: failed to determine capabilities\n",
__func__);
goto out;
}