seccomp: fix kernel-doc function name warning
authorRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Sun, 8 Jan 2023 02:12:28 +0000 (18:12 -0800)
committerKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Sat, 14 Jan 2023 01:01:06 +0000 (17:01 -0800)
Move the ACTION_ONLY() macro so that it is not between the kernel-doc
notation and the function definition for seccomp_run_filters(),
eliminating a kernel-doc warning:

kernel/seccomp.c:400: warning: expecting prototype for seccomp_run_filters(). Prototype was for ACTION_ONLY() instead

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230108021228.15975-1-rdunlap@infradead.org
kernel/seccomp.c

index e9852d1..cebf264 100644 (file)
@@ -388,6 +388,7 @@ static inline bool seccomp_cache_check_allow(const struct seccomp_filter *sfilte
 }
 #endif /* SECCOMP_ARCH_NATIVE */
 
+#define ACTION_ONLY(ret) ((s32)((ret) & (SECCOMP_RET_ACTION_FULL)))
 /**
  * seccomp_run_filters - evaluates all seccomp filters against @sd
  * @sd: optional seccomp data to be passed to filters
@@ -397,7 +398,6 @@ static inline bool seccomp_cache_check_allow(const struct seccomp_filter *sfilte
  *
  * Returns valid seccomp BPF response codes.
  */
-#define ACTION_ONLY(ret) ((s32)((ret) & (SECCOMP_RET_ACTION_FULL)))
 static u32 seccomp_run_filters(const struct seccomp_data *sd,
                               struct seccomp_filter **match)
 {