signal: introduce retarget_shared_pending()
authorOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Wed, 27 Apr 2011 17:17:37 +0000 (19:17 +0200)
committerOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Thu, 28 Apr 2011 11:01:35 +0000 (13:01 +0200)
No functional changes. Move the notify-other-threads code from exit_signals()
to the new helper, retarget_shared_pending().

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
kernel/signal.c

index c15e979..5341e21 100644 (file)
@@ -2198,10 +2198,25 @@ relock:
        return signr;
 }
 
+/*
+ * It could be that complete_signal() picked us to notify about the
+ * group-wide signal. Another thread should be notified now to take
+ * the signal since we will not.
+ */
+static void retarget_shared_pending(struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+       struct task_struct *t;
+
+       t = tsk;
+       while_each_thread(tsk, t) {
+               if (!signal_pending(t) && !(t->flags & PF_EXITING))
+                       recalc_sigpending_and_wake(t);
+       }
+}
+
 void exit_signals(struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
        int group_stop = 0;
-       struct task_struct *t;
 
        if (thread_group_empty(tsk) || signal_group_exit(tsk->signal)) {
                tsk->flags |= PF_EXITING;
@@ -2217,14 +2232,7 @@ void exit_signals(struct task_struct *tsk)
        if (!signal_pending(tsk))
                goto out;
 
-       /*
-        * It could be that __group_complete_signal() choose us to
-        * notify about group-wide signal. Another thread should be
-        * woken now to take the signal since we will not.
-        */
-       for (t = tsk; (t = next_thread(t)) != tsk; )
-               if (!signal_pending(t) && !(t->flags & PF_EXITING))
-                       recalc_sigpending_and_wake(t);
+       retarget_shared_pending(tsk);
 
        if (unlikely(tsk->group_stop & GROUP_STOP_PENDING) &&
            task_participate_group_stop(tsk))