child = sd->s_dentry;
+ /*
+ * Note: we hide this from lockdep since we have no way
+ * to teach lockdep about recursive
+ * I_MUTEX_PARENT -> I_MUTEX_CHILD patterns along a path
+ * in an inode tree, which are valid as soon as
+ * I_MUTEX_PARENT -> I_MUTEX_CHILD is valid from a
+ * parent inode to one of its children.
+ */
+ lockdep_off();
mutex_lock(&child->d_inode->i_mutex);
+ lockdep_on();
configfs_detach_group(sd->s_element);
child->d_inode->i_flags |= S_DEAD;
+ lockdep_off();
mutex_unlock(&child->d_inode->i_mutex);
+ lockdep_on();
d_delete(child);
dput(child);
* We are going to remove an inode and its dentry but
* the VFS may already have hit and used them. Thus,
* we must lock them as rmdir() would.
+ *
+ * Note: we hide this from lockdep since we have no way
+ * to teach lockdep about recursive
+ * I_MUTEX_PARENT -> I_MUTEX_CHILD patterns along a path
+ * in an inode tree, which are valid as soon as
+ * I_MUTEX_PARENT -> I_MUTEX_CHILD is valid from a
+ * parent inode to one of its children.
*/
+ lockdep_off();
mutex_lock(&dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
+ lockdep_on();
configfs_remove_dir(item);
dentry->d_inode->i_flags |= S_DEAD;
+ lockdep_off();
mutex_unlock(&dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
+ lockdep_on();
d_delete(dentry);
}
}
*
* We must also lock the inode to remove it safely in case of
* error, as rmdir() would.
+ *
+ * Note: we hide this from lockdep since we have no way
+ * to teach lockdep about recursive
+ * I_MUTEX_PARENT -> I_MUTEX_CHILD patterns along a path
+ * in an inode tree, which are valid as soon as
+ * I_MUTEX_PARENT -> I_MUTEX_CHILD is valid from a
+ * parent inode to one of its children.
*/
+ lockdep_off();
mutex_lock_nested(&dentry->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_CHILD);
+ lockdep_on();
ret = populate_groups(to_config_group(item));
if (ret) {
configfs_detach_item(item);
dentry->d_inode->i_flags |= S_DEAD;
}
+ lockdep_off();
mutex_unlock(&dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
+ lockdep_on();
if (ret)
d_delete(dentry);
}
BUG_ON(!origin || !sd);
/* Lock this guy on the way down */
+ /*
+ * Note: we hide this from lockdep since we have no way
+ * to teach lockdep about recursive
+ * I_MUTEX_PARENT -> I_MUTEX_CHILD patterns along a path
+ * in an inode tree, which are valid as soon as
+ * I_MUTEX_PARENT -> I_MUTEX_CHILD is valid from a
+ * parent inode to one of its children.
+ */
+ lockdep_off();
mutex_lock(&sd->s_dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
+ lockdep_on();
if (sd->s_element == target) /* Boo-yah */
goto out;
}
/* We looped all our children and didn't find target */
+ lockdep_off();
mutex_unlock(&sd->s_dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
+ lockdep_on();
ret = -ENOENT;
out:
struct dentry *dentry = item->ci_dentry;
while (dentry != origin) {
+ /* See comments in configfs_depend_prep() */
+ lockdep_off();
mutex_unlock(&dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
+ lockdep_on();
dentry = dentry->d_parent;
}
+ lockdep_off();
mutex_unlock(&origin->d_inode->i_mutex);
+ lockdep_on();
}
int configfs_depend_item(struct configfs_subsystem *subsys,
}
/* Wait until the racing operation terminates */
+ /*
+ * Note: we hide this from lockdep since we are locked
+ * with subclass I_MUTEX_NORMAL from vfs_rmdir() (why
+ * not I_MUTEX_CHILD?), and I_MUTEX_XATTR or
+ * I_MUTEX_QUOTA are not relevant for the locked inode.
+ */
+ lockdep_off();
mutex_lock(wait_mutex);
mutex_unlock(wait_mutex);
+ lockdep_on();
}
} while (ret == -EAGAIN);