Update osquery comparision table
authorSangwan Kwon <sangwan.kwon@samsung.com>
Mon, 9 Mar 2020 01:17:56 +0000 (10:17 +0900)
committerSangwan Kwon <sangwan.kwon@samsung.com>
Mon, 9 Mar 2020 01:17:56 +0000 (10:17 +0900)
Signed-off-by: Sangwan Kwon <sangwan.kwon@samsung.com>
doc/comparision-with-osquery.md

index 3640313..bed193c 100644 (file)
@@ -11,12 +11,7 @@ more efficient interface from this different perspective.
 
 |   | ViST | [OsQuery](https://github.com/osquery/osquery) |
 |---|---|---|
-| perspective | system developer | system administrator |
-| component | daemon, **library** | daemon, shell |
-| **dependencies** | xxx | xxx |
-| **size** | xxx | xxx |
-| code line | xxx | xxx |
-| type | SAM | OPENM |
-
-## [What are the current pain points of osquery?](https://blog.trailofbits.com/2017/12/21/osquery-pain-points/)
-XXX
+| Perspective | system developer | system administrator |
+| Project Type | SAM | OPENM |
+| Component | daemon, **library** | daemon, shell |
+| **Additional<br>dependencies<br>(without tizen)** | jinja2-python<br>rapidjson | jinja2-python<br>rapidsjon<br>lz4<br>zstd<br>rocksdb<br>thrift<br>|