In dn_rt_cache_get_next(), no need to guard seq->private by a
rcu_dereference() since seq is private to the thread running this
function. Reading seq.private once (as guaranted bu rcu_dereference())
or several time if compiler really is dumb enough wont change the
result.
But we miss real spots where rcu_dereference() are needed, both in
dn_rt_cache_get_first() and dn_rt_cache_get_next()
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
break;
rcu_read_unlock_bh();
}
- return rt;
+ return rcu_dereference(rt);
}
static struct dn_route *dn_rt_cache_get_next(struct seq_file *seq, struct dn_route *rt)
{
- struct dn_rt_cache_iter_state *s = rcu_dereference(seq->private);
+ struct dn_rt_cache_iter_state *s = seq->private;
rt = rt->u.dst.dn_next;
while(!rt) {
rcu_read_lock_bh();
rt = dn_rt_hash_table[s->bucket].chain;
}
- return rt;
+ return rcu_dereference(rt);
}
static void *dn_rt_cache_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)