Fix wording of comment about string handling
authorDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:45:16 +0000 (08:45 +0100)
committerDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:45:19 +0000 (08:45 +0100)
The library *will* free them later. Honest! If we say "should", someone
might get confused and think we're saying the *caller* needs to do it.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
openconnect.h

index 48d67cc..c4a0075 100644 (file)
@@ -132,8 +132,8 @@ struct openconnect_info;
 
 #define OPENCONNECT_X509 void
 
-/* Unless otherwise specified, all functions which set strings will
-   take ownership of those strings and should free them later in
+/* Unless otherwise specified, all functions which set strings will take
+   ownership of those strings and the library will free them later in
    openconnect_vpninfo_free() */