gcc-7 flags the use of integer math inside of a condition
as a potential bug:
fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c: In function 'xfs_swap_extents_check_format':
fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c:1619:8: error: '<<' in boolean context, did you mean '<' ? [-Werror=int-in-bool-context]
fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c:1629:8: error: '<<' in boolean context, did you mean '<' ? [-Werror=int-in-bool-context]
There is already a helper function for testing the di_forkoff
field for zero, so let's use that instead to shut up the warning.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
* extent format...
*/
if (tip->i_d.di_format == XFS_DINODE_FMT_BTREE) {
- if (XFS_IFORK_BOFF(ip) &&
+ if (XFS_IFORK_Q(ip) &&
XFS_BMAP_BMDR_SPACE(tip->i_df.if_broot) > XFS_IFORK_BOFF(ip))
return -EINVAL;
if (XFS_IFORK_NEXTENTS(tip, XFS_DATA_FORK) <=
/* Reciprocal target->temp btree format checks */
if (ip->i_d.di_format == XFS_DINODE_FMT_BTREE) {
- if (XFS_IFORK_BOFF(tip) &&
+ if (XFS_IFORK_Q(tip) &&
XFS_BMAP_BMDR_SPACE(ip->i_df.if_broot) > XFS_IFORK_BOFF(tip))
return -EINVAL;
if (XFS_IFORK_NEXTENTS(ip, XFS_DATA_FORK) <=