* gdb.base/callfuncs.exp: The stabs generated by GCC don't tell us
authorJim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com>
Fri, 7 Dec 2001 21:17:00 +0000 (21:17 +0000)
committerJim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com>
Fri, 7 Dec 2001 21:17:00 +0000 (21:17 +0000)
whether functions are prototyped or not, so we can't possibly pass
arguments to t_float_values2 properly.

gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/callfuncs.exp

index ee5be1c..7ca7205 100644 (file)
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
 2001-12-07  Jim Blandy  <jimb@redhat.com>
 
+       * gdb.base/callfuncs.exp: The stabs generated by GCC don't tell us
+       whether functions are prototyped or not, so we can't possibly pass
+       arguments to t_float_values2 properly.
+
        * gdb.base/break.exp: (test_next_with_recursion): Don't change the
        value of `timeout' for targets other than the mips*tx39-*.
 
index 43d6177..86b7c04 100644 (file)
@@ -142,6 +142,9 @@ proc do_function_calls {} {
        gdb_test "p t_float_values(float_val1,-2.3765)" " = 1"
 
        # Test passing of arguments which might not be widened.
+        # Under stabs, GCC doesn't tell us whether the function was
+        # prototyped or not.
+        if {$gcc_compiled} { setup_xfail_format "stabs" }
        gdb_test "p t_float_values2(0.0,0.0)" " = 0"
 
        # Although PR 5318 mentions SunOS specifically, this seems
@@ -152,7 +155,12 @@ proc do_function_calls {} {
                setup_xfail "alpha-dec-osf2*" "i*86-*-sysv4*" 5318
            }
        }
+        
+        # Under stabs, GCC doesn't tell us whether the function was
+        # prototyped or not.
+        if {$gcc_compiled} { setup_xfail_format "stabs" }
        gdb_test "p t_float_values2(3.14159,float_val2)" " = 1"
+
        gdb_test "p t_small_values(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10)" " = 55"
 
        gdb_test "p t_double_values(0.0,0.0)" " = 0"
@@ -290,6 +298,8 @@ if { $hp_aCC_compiler } {
     }
 }
 
+get_debug_format
+
 # Make sure that malloc gets called and that the floating point unit
 # is initialized via a call to t_double_values.
 gdb_test "next" "t_double_values\\(double_val1, double_val2\\);.*" \