I should not have renamed this field.
I should not have renamed this field.
I should not have renamed this field.
On the plus side, it was at least binary compatible.
LOCK_TEST_WITH_RETURN(dev, file_priv);
- if (param->planes & ~0x3) {
+ /* This is really planes */
+ if (param->pipes & ~0x3) {
DRM_ERROR("Invalid planes 0x%x, only <= 0x3 is valid\n",
- param->planes);
+ param->pipes);
return -EINVAL;
}
- i915_dispatch_flip(dev, param->planes, 0);
+ i915_dispatch_flip(dev, param->pipes, 0);
return 0;
}
/* Asynchronous page flipping:
*/
typedef struct drm_i915_flip {
- int planes;
+ /*
+ * This is really talking about planes, and we could rename it
+ * except for the fact that some of the duplicated i915_drm.h files
+ * out there check for HAVE_I915_FLIP and so might pick up this
+ * version.
+ */
+ int pipes;
} drm_i915_flip_t;
/* Allow drivers to submit batchbuffers directly to hardware, relying