cecf5d87ff20 ("block: split .sysfs_lock into two locks") starts to
release & actuire sysfs_lock again during switching elevator. So it
isn't enough to prevent switching elevator from happening by simply
clearing QUEUE_FLAG_REGISTERED with holding sysfs_lock, because
in-progress switch still can move on after re-acquiring the lock,
meantime the flag of QUEUE_FLAG_REGISTERED won't get checked.
Fixes this issue by checking 'q->elevator' directly & locklessly after
q->kobj is removed in blk_unregister_queue(), this way is safe because
q->elevator can't be changed at that time.
Fixes:
cecf5d87ff20 ("block: split .sysfs_lock into two locks")
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
void blk_unregister_queue(struct gendisk *disk)
{
struct request_queue *q = disk->queue;
- bool has_elevator;
if (WARN_ON(!q))
return;
*/
mutex_lock(&q->sysfs_lock);
blk_queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_REGISTERED, q);
- has_elevator = !!q->elevator;
mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_lock);
mutex_lock(&q->sysfs_dir_lock);
kobject_del(&q->kobj);
blk_trace_remove_sysfs(disk_to_dev(disk));
- if (has_elevator)
+ /*
+ * q->kobj has been removed, so it is safe to check if elevator
+ * exists without holding q->sysfs_lock.
+ */
+ if (q->elevator)
elv_unregister_queue(q);
mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_dir_lock);