kasan: test: fix compatibility with FORTIFY_SOURCE
authorMarco Elver <elver@google.com>
Sat, 29 Jan 2022 21:41:11 +0000 (13:41 -0800)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Sun, 30 Jan 2022 07:56:58 +0000 (09:56 +0200)
With CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE enabled, string functions will also perform
dynamic checks using __builtin_object_size(ptr), which when failed will
panic the kernel.

Because the KASAN test deliberately performs out-of-bounds operations,
the kernel panics with FORTIFY_SOURCE, for example:

 | kernel BUG at lib/string_helpers.c:910!
 | invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
 | CPU: 1 PID: 137 Comm: kunit_try_catch Tainted: G    B             5.16.0-rc3+ #3
 | Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014
 | RIP: 0010:fortify_panic+0x19/0x1b
 | ...
 | Call Trace:
 |  kmalloc_oob_in_memset.cold+0x16/0x16
 |  ...

Fix it by also hiding `ptr` from the optimizer, which will ensure that
__builtin_object_size() does not return a valid size, preventing
fortified string functions from panicking.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220124160744.1244685-1-elver@google.com
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Reported-by: Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
lib/test_kasan.c

index 847cdbe..26a5c90 100644 (file)
@@ -492,6 +492,7 @@ static void kmalloc_oob_in_memset(struct kunit *test)
        ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
        KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
 
+       OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr);
        OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(size);
        KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
                                memset(ptr, 0, size + KASAN_GRANULE_SIZE));
@@ -515,6 +516,7 @@ static void kmalloc_memmove_negative_size(struct kunit *test)
        KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
 
        memset((char *)ptr, 0, 64);
+       OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr);
        OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(invalid_size);
        KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
                memmove((char *)ptr, (char *)ptr + 4, invalid_size));
@@ -531,6 +533,7 @@ static void kmalloc_memmove_invalid_size(struct kunit *test)
        KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
 
        memset((char *)ptr, 0, 64);
+       OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr);
        KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
                memmove((char *)ptr, (char *)ptr + 4, invalid_size));
        kfree(ptr);
@@ -893,6 +896,7 @@ static void kasan_memchr(struct kunit *test)
        ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
        KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
 
+       OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr);
        OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(size);
        KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
                kasan_ptr_result = memchr(ptr, '1', size + 1));
@@ -919,6 +923,7 @@ static void kasan_memcmp(struct kunit *test)
        KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
        memset(arr, 0, sizeof(arr));
 
+       OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr);
        OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(size);
        KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
                kasan_int_result = memcmp(ptr, arr, size+1));