All bonding device has same lockdep key and subclass is initialized with
nest_level.
But actual nest_level value can be changed when a lower device is attached.
And at this moment, the subclass should be updated but it seems to be
unsafe.
So this patch makes bonding use dynamic lockdep key instead of the
subclass.
Test commands:
ip link add bond0 type bond
for i in {1..5}
do
let A=$i-1
ip link add bond$i type bond
ip link set bond$i master bond$A
done
ip link set bond5 master bond0
Splat looks like:
[ 307.992912] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[ 307.993656] 5.4.0-rc3+ #96 Tainted: G W
[ 307.994367] --------------------------------------------
[ 307.995092] ip/761 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 307.995710]
ffff8880513aac60 (&(&bond->stats_lock)->rlock#2/2){+.+.}, at: bond_get_stats+0xb8/0x500 [bonding]
[ 307.997045]
but task is already holding lock:
[ 307.997923]
ffff88805fcbac60 (&(&bond->stats_lock)->rlock#2/2){+.+.}, at: bond_get_stats+0xb8/0x500 [bonding]
[ 307.999215]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 308.000251] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 308.001137] CPU0
[ 308.001533] ----
[ 308.001915] lock(&(&bond->stats_lock)->rlock#2/2);
[ 308.002609] lock(&(&bond->stats_lock)->rlock#2/2);
[ 308.003302]
*** DEADLOCK ***
[ 308.004310] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[ 308.005319] 3 locks held by ip/761:
[ 308.005830] #0:
ffffffff9fcc42b0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x466/0x8a0
[ 308.006894] #1:
ffff88805fcbac60 (&(&bond->stats_lock)->rlock#2/2){+.+.}, at: bond_get_stats+0xb8/0x500 [bonding]
[ 308.008243] #2:
ffffffff9f9219c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: bond_get_stats+0x9f/0x500 [bonding]
[ 308.009422]
stack backtrace:
[ 308.010124] CPU: 0 PID: 761 Comm: ip Tainted: G W 5.4.0-rc3+ #96
[ 308.011097] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006
[ 308.012179] Call Trace:
[ 308.012601] dump_stack+0x7c/0xbb
[ 308.013089] __lock_acquire+0x269d/0x3de0
[ 308.013669] ? register_lock_class+0x14d0/0x14d0
[ 308.014318] lock_acquire+0x164/0x3b0
[ 308.014858] ? bond_get_stats+0xb8/0x500 [bonding]
[ 308.015520] _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x2e/0x60
[ 308.016129] ? bond_get_stats+0xb8/0x500 [bonding]
[ 308.017215] bond_get_stats+0xb8/0x500 [bonding]
[ 308.018454] ? bond_arp_rcv+0xf10/0xf10 [bonding]
[ 308.019710] ? rcu_read_lock_held+0x90/0xa0
[ 308.020605] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xc0/0xc0
[ 308.021286] ? bond_get_stats+0x9f/0x500 [bonding]
[ 308.021953] dev_get_stats+0x1ec/0x270
[ 308.022508] bond_get_stats+0x1d1/0x500 [bonding]
Fixes:
d3fff6c443fe ("net: add netdev_lockdep_set_classes() helper")
Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
struct list_head *iter;
struct slave *slave;
- spin_lock_nested(&bond->stats_lock, bond_get_nest_level(bond_dev));
+ spin_lock(&bond->stats_lock);
memcpy(stats, &bond->bond_stats, sizeof(*stats));
rcu_read_lock();
{
struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
- spin_lock_init(&bond->mode_lock);
- spin_lock_init(&bond->stats_lock);
bond->params = bonding_defaults;
/* Initialize pointers */
list_del(&bond->bond_list);
+ lockdep_unregister_key(&bond->stats_lock_key);
bond_debug_unregister(bond);
}
bond->nest_level = SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING;
+ spin_lock_init(&bond->mode_lock);
+ spin_lock_init(&bond->stats_lock);
+ lockdep_register_key(&bond->stats_lock_key);
+ lockdep_set_class(&bond->stats_lock, &bond->stats_lock_key);
+
list_add_tail(&bond->bond_list, &bn->dev_list);
bond_prepare_sysfs_group(bond);
struct dentry *debug_dir;
#endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_FS */
struct rtnl_link_stats64 bond_stats;
+ struct lock_class_key stats_lock_key;
};
#define bond_slave_get_rcu(dev) \