[ Upstream commit
4697b5848bd933f68ebd04836362c8de0cacaf71 ]
Since commit
4e57a4ddf6b0 ("ARM: 9107/1: syscall: always store
thread_info->abi_syscall"), the seccomp selftests "syscall_errno"
and "syscall_faked" have been broken. Both seccomp and PTRACE depend
on using the special value of "-1" for skipping syscalls. This value
wasn't working because it was getting masked by __NR_SYSCALL_MASK in
both PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL and get_syscall_nr().
Explicitly test for -1 in PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL and get_syscall_nr(),
leaving it exposed when present, allowing tracers to skip syscalls
again.
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Cc: Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Fixes: 4e57a4ddf6b0 ("ARM: 9107/1: syscall: always store thread_info->abi_syscall")
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230810195422.2304827-2-keescook@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AEABI) && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OABI_COMPAT))
return task_thread_info(task)->abi_syscall;
+ if (task_thread_info(task)->abi_syscall == -1)
+ return -1;
+
return task_thread_info(task)->abi_syscall & __NR_SYSCALL_MASK;
}
break;
case PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL:
- task_thread_info(child)->abi_syscall = data &
- __NR_SYSCALL_MASK;
+ if (data != -1)
+ data &= __NR_SYSCALL_MASK;
+ task_thread_info(child)->abi_syscall = data;
ret = 0;
break;