Following RFC 6554 [1], the current order of fields is wrong for big
endian definition. Indeed, here is how the header looks like:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Next Header | Hdr Ext Len | Routing Type | Segments Left |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| CmprI | CmprE | Pad | Reserved |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
This patch reorders fields so that big endian definition is now correct.
[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6554#section-3
Fixes: cfa933d938d8 ("include: uapi: linux: add rpl sr header definition")
Signed-off-by: Justin Iurman <justin.iurman@uliege.be>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
pad:4,
reserved1:16;
#elif defined(__BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
- __u32 reserved:20,
+ __u32 cmpri:4,
+ cmpre:4,
pad:4,
- cmpri:4,
- cmpre:4;
+ reserved:20;
#else
#error "Please fix <asm/byteorder.h>"
#endif