Reset the LRU slot if it becomes invalid when deleting a memslot to fix
an out-of-bounds/use-after-free access when searching through memslots.
Explicitly check for there being no used slots in search_memslots(), and
in the caller of s390's approximation variant.
Fixes:
36947254e5f9 ("KVM: Dynamically size memslot array based on number of used slots")
Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Message-Id: <
20200320205546.2396-2-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
struct kvm_memslots *slots = kvm_memslots(kvm);
struct kvm_memory_slot *ms;
+ if (unlikely(!slots->used_slots))
+ return 0;
+
cur_gfn = kvm_s390_next_dirty_cmma(slots, args->start_gfn);
ms = gfn_to_memslot(kvm, cur_gfn);
args->count = 0;
int slot = atomic_read(&slots->lru_slot);
struct kvm_memory_slot *memslots = slots->memslots;
+ if (unlikely(!slots->used_slots))
+ return NULL;
+
if (gfn >= memslots[slot].base_gfn &&
gfn < memslots[slot].base_gfn + memslots[slot].npages)
return &memslots[slot];
slots->used_slots--;
+ if (atomic_read(&slots->lru_slot) >= slots->used_slots)
+ atomic_set(&slots->lru_slot, 0);
+
for (i = slots->id_to_index[memslot->id]; i < slots->used_slots; i++) {
mslots[i] = mslots[i + 1];
slots->id_to_index[mslots[i].id] = i;