re PR tree-optimization/46728 (GCC does not generate fmadd for pow (x, 0.75)+y on...
authorBill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tue, 7 Jun 2011 15:12:04 +0000 (15:12 +0000)
committerWilliam Schmidt <wschmidt@gcc.gnu.org>
Tue, 7 Jun 2011 15:12:04 +0000 (15:12 +0000)
2011-06-07  Bill Schmidt  <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

PR tree-optimization/46728
* tree-ssa-math-opts.c (gimple_expand_builtin_pow): Change FIXME
to use gimple_val_nonnegative_real_p.
* gimple-fold.c (gimple_val_nonnegative_real_p): New function.
* gimple.h (gimple_val_nonnegative_real_p): New declaration.

From-SVN: r174752

gcc/ChangeLog
gcc/gimple-fold.c
gcc/gimple.h
gcc/tree-ssa-math-opts.c

index f823caf..932e8e1 100644 (file)
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+2011-06-07  Bill Schmidt  <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
+
+       PR tree-optimization/46728
+       * tree-ssa-math-opts.c (gimple_expand_builtin_pow): Change FIXME
+       to use gimple_val_nonnegative_real_p.
+       * gimple-fold.c (gimple_val_nonnegative_real_p): New function.
+       * gimple.h (gimple_val_nonnegative_real_p): New declaration.
+       
 2011-06-07  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
 
        * config/i386/i386.md (*movsf_internal): Optimize AVX check.
index eaff1b3..180a51e 100644 (file)
@@ -3447,3 +3447,134 @@ fold_const_aggregate_ref (tree t)
 {
   return fold_const_aggregate_ref_1 (t, NULL);
 }
+
+/* Return true iff VAL is a gimple expression that is known to be
+   non-negative.  Restricted to floating-point inputs.  */
+
+bool
+gimple_val_nonnegative_real_p (tree val)
+{
+  gimple def_stmt;
+
+  gcc_assert (val && SCALAR_FLOAT_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (val)));
+
+  /* Use existing logic for non-gimple trees.  */
+  if (tree_expr_nonnegative_p (val))
+    return true;
+
+  if (TREE_CODE (val) != SSA_NAME)
+    return false;
+
+  /* Currently we look only at the immediately defining statement
+     to make this determination, since recursion on defining 
+     statements of operands can lead to quadratic behavior in the
+     worst case.  This is expected to catch almost all occurrences
+     in practice.  It would be possible to implement limited-depth
+     recursion if important cases are lost.  Alternatively, passes
+     that need this information (such as the pow/powi lowering code
+     in the cse_sincos pass) could be revised to provide it through
+     dataflow propagation.  */
+
+  def_stmt = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (val);
+
+  if (is_gimple_assign (def_stmt))
+    {
+      tree op0, op1;
+
+      /* See fold-const.c:tree_expr_nonnegative_p for additional
+        cases that could be handled with recursion.  */
+
+      switch (gimple_assign_rhs_code (def_stmt))
+       {
+       case ABS_EXPR:
+         /* Always true for floating-point operands.  */
+         return true;
+
+       case MULT_EXPR:
+         /* True if the two operands are identical (since we are
+            restricted to floating-point inputs).  */
+         op0 = gimple_assign_rhs1 (def_stmt);
+         op1 = gimple_assign_rhs2 (def_stmt);
+
+         if (op0 == op1
+             || operand_equal_p (op0, op1, 0))
+           return true;
+
+       default:
+         return false;
+       }
+    }
+  else if (is_gimple_call (def_stmt))
+    {
+      tree fndecl = gimple_call_fndecl (def_stmt);
+      if (fndecl
+         && DECL_BUILT_IN_CLASS (fndecl) == BUILT_IN_NORMAL)
+       {
+         tree arg1;
+
+         switch (DECL_FUNCTION_CODE (fndecl))
+           {
+           CASE_FLT_FN (BUILT_IN_ACOS):
+           CASE_FLT_FN (BUILT_IN_ACOSH):
+           CASE_FLT_FN (BUILT_IN_CABS):
+           CASE_FLT_FN (BUILT_IN_COSH):
+           CASE_FLT_FN (BUILT_IN_ERFC):
+           CASE_FLT_FN (BUILT_IN_EXP):
+           CASE_FLT_FN (BUILT_IN_EXP10):
+           CASE_FLT_FN (BUILT_IN_EXP2):
+           CASE_FLT_FN (BUILT_IN_FABS):
+           CASE_FLT_FN (BUILT_IN_FDIM):
+           CASE_FLT_FN (BUILT_IN_HYPOT):
+           CASE_FLT_FN (BUILT_IN_POW10):
+             return true;
+
+           CASE_FLT_FN (BUILT_IN_SQRT):
+             /* sqrt(-0.0) is -0.0, and sqrt is not defined over other
+                nonnegative inputs.  */
+             if (!HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (val))))
+               return true;
+
+             break;
+
+           CASE_FLT_FN (BUILT_IN_POWI):
+             /* True if the second argument is an even integer.  */
+             arg1 = gimple_call_arg (def_stmt, 1);
+
+             if (TREE_CODE (arg1) == INTEGER_CST
+                 && (TREE_INT_CST_LOW (arg1) & 1) == 0)
+               return true;
+
+             break;
+             
+           CASE_FLT_FN (BUILT_IN_POW):
+             /* True if the second argument is an even integer-valued
+                real.  */
+             arg1 = gimple_call_arg (def_stmt, 1);
+
+             if (TREE_CODE (arg1) == REAL_CST)
+               {
+                 REAL_VALUE_TYPE c;
+                 HOST_WIDE_INT n;
+
+                 c = TREE_REAL_CST (arg1);
+                 n = real_to_integer (&c);
+
+                 if ((n & 1) == 0)
+                   {
+                     REAL_VALUE_TYPE cint;
+                     real_from_integer (&cint, VOIDmode, n, n < 0 ? -1 : 0, 0);
+                     if (real_identical (&c, &cint))
+                       return true;
+                   }
+               }
+
+             break;
+
+           default:
+             return false;
+           }
+       }
+    }
+
+  return false;
+}
index 0648888..c39eb57 100644 (file)
@@ -4988,4 +4988,5 @@ extern tree maybe_fold_and_comparisons (enum tree_code, tree, tree,
 extern tree maybe_fold_or_comparisons (enum tree_code, tree, tree,
                                       enum tree_code, tree, tree);
 
+bool gimple_val_nonnegative_real_p (tree);
 #endif  /* GCC_GIMPLE_H */
index f53a300..e6b5857 100644 (file)
@@ -1172,13 +1172,7 @@ gimple_expand_builtin_pow (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, location_t loc,
 
   if (flag_unsafe_math_optimizations
       && cbrtfn
-      /* FIXME: The following line was originally
-        && (tree_expr_nonnegative_p (arg0) || !HONOR_NANS (mode)),
-        but since arg0 is a gimple value, the first predicate
-        will always return false.  It needs to be replaced with a
-        call to a similar gimple_val_nonnegative_p function to be
-         added in gimple-fold.c.  */
-      && !HONOR_NANS (mode)
+      && (gimple_val_nonnegative_real_p (arg0) || !HONOR_NANS (mode))
       && REAL_VALUES_EQUAL (c, dconst1_3))
     return build_and_insert_call (gsi, loc, &target, cbrtfn, arg0);
   
@@ -1190,13 +1184,7 @@ gimple_expand_builtin_pow (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, location_t loc,
   if (flag_unsafe_math_optimizations
       && sqrtfn
       && cbrtfn
-      /* FIXME: The following line was originally
-        && (tree_expr_nonnegative_p (arg0) || !HONOR_NANS (mode)),
-        but since arg0 is a gimple value, the first predicate
-        will always return false.  It needs to be replaced with a
-        call to a similar gimple_val_nonnegative_p function to be
-         added in gimple-fold.c.  */
-      && !HONOR_NANS (mode)
+      && (gimple_val_nonnegative_real_p (arg0) || !HONOR_NANS (mode))
       && optimize_function_for_speed_p (cfun)
       && hw_sqrt_exists
       && REAL_VALUES_EQUAL (c, dconst1_6))
@@ -1270,13 +1258,7 @@ gimple_expand_builtin_pow (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, location_t loc,
 
   if (flag_unsafe_math_optimizations
       && cbrtfn
-      /* FIXME: The following line was originally
-        && (tree_expr_nonnegative_p (arg0) || !HONOR_NANS (mode)),
-        but since arg0 is a gimple value, the first predicate
-        will always return false.  It needs to be replaced with a
-        call to a similar gimple_val_nonnegative_p function to be
-         added in gimple-fold.c.  */
-      && !HONOR_NANS (mode)
+      && (gimple_val_nonnegative_real_p (arg0) || !HONOR_NANS (mode))
       && real_identical (&c2, &c)
       && optimize_function_for_speed_p (cfun)
       && powi_cost (n / 3) <= POWI_MAX_MULTS)