I'm pretty sure we are in fact doing the right thing here, but someone who knows the standard better should double-check that we are in fact supposed to zero out the member in the given testcase.
llvm-svn: 157138
if (E->requiresZeroInitialization() && !Dest.isZeroed()) {
switch (E->getConstructionKind()) {
case CXXConstructExpr::CK_Delegating:
- assert(0 && "Delegating constructor should not need zeroing");
case CXXConstructExpr::CK_Complete:
EmitNullInitialization(Dest.getAddr(), E->getType());
break;
delegator::delegator(int)
: delegator()
{}
+
+namespace PR12890 {
+ class X {
+ int x;
+ X() = default;
+ X(int);
+ };
+ X::X(int) : X() {}
+}
+// CHECK: define {{.*}} @_ZN7PR128901XC1Ei(%"class.PR12890::X"* %this, i32)
+// CHECK: call void @llvm.memset.p0i8.i64(i8* {{.*}}, i8 0, i64 4, i32 4, i1 false)