libstdc++: Fix move construction of std::tuple with array elements [PR101960]
authorJonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Thu, 19 Aug 2021 10:48:40 +0000 (11:48 +0100)
committerJonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Thu, 19 Aug 2021 12:02:12 +0000 (13:02 +0100)
An array member cannot be direct-initialized in a ctor-initializer-list,
so use the base class' move constructor, which does the right thing for
both arrays and non-arrays.

This constructor could be defaulted, but that would make it trivial for
some specializations, which would change the argument passing ABI. Do
that for the versioned namespace only.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

PR libstdc++/101960
* include/std/tuple (_Tuple_impl(_Tuple_impl&&)): Use base
class' move constructor. Define as defaulted for versioned
namespace.
* testsuite/20_util/tuple/cons/101960.cc: New test.

libstdc++-v3/include/std/tuple
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/tuple/cons/101960.cc [new file with mode: 0644]

index 1292aee..f082ccb 100644 (file)
@@ -438,11 +438,15 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
       // 2729. Missing SFINAE on std::pair::operator=
       _Tuple_impl& operator=(const _Tuple_impl&) = delete;
 
+#if _GLIBCXX_INLINE_VERSION
+      _Tuple_impl(_Tuple_impl&&) = default;
+#else
       constexpr
       _Tuple_impl(_Tuple_impl&& __in)
       noexcept(is_nothrow_move_constructible<_Head>::value)
-      : _Base(std::forward<_Head>(_M_head(__in)))
+      : _Base(static_cast<_Base&&>(__in))
       { }
+#endif
 
       template<typename _UHead>
        constexpr
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/tuple/cons/101960.cc b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/tuple/cons/101960.cc
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..f14604c
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+#include <tuple>
+std::tuple<int[1]> t;
+auto tt = std::move(t); // PR libstdc++/101960