Is it more appropriate to rename the parameter in question
"margin", as suggested by the documentation, or have the
documentation refer to "m", as suggested by the code?
Change-Id: I5768ef044164e099ef1db77adda42171799cbf12
Reviewed-by: Casper van Donderen <casper.vandonderen@nokia.com>
\fn QDataStream &operator<<(QDataStream &stream, const QMargins &m)
\relates QMargins
- Writes the given \a margin to the given \a stream and returns a
+ Writes margin \a m to the given \a stream and returns a
reference to the stream.
\sa {Serializing Qt Data Types}
\fn QDataStream &operator>>(QDataStream &stream, QMargins &m)
\relates QMargins
- Reads a margin from the given \a stream into the given \a margin
+ Reads a margin from the given \a stream into margin \a m
and returns a reference to the stream.
\sa {Serializing Qt Data Types}