The isofs patch needs a small fix to handle a signed/unsigned comparison that
the compiler didn't flag - thanks to Dan for catching it.
It should be noted, however, the session number handing appears to be incorrect
between where it is parsed and where it is used.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
if (sbi->s_check) seq_printf(m, ",check=%c", sbi->s_check);
if (sbi->s_mapping) seq_printf(m, ",map=%c", sbi->s_mapping);
if (sbi->s_check) seq_printf(m, ",check=%c", sbi->s_check);
if (sbi->s_mapping) seq_printf(m, ",map=%c", sbi->s_mapping);
- if (sbi->s_session != -1) seq_printf(m, ",session=%u", sbi->s_session);
+ if (sbi->s_session != 255) seq_printf(m, ",session=%u", sbi->s_session - 1);
if (sbi->s_sbsector != -1) seq_printf(m, ",sbsector=%u", sbi->s_sbsector);
if (root->d_sb->s_blocksize != 1024)
if (sbi->s_sbsector != -1) seq_printf(m, ",sbsector=%u", sbi->s_sbsector);
if (root->d_sb->s_blocksize != 1024)