Currently visit_type_size checks if the visitor's type_size function pointer is
NULL. If not, it calls it, otherwise it calls v->type_uint64(). But neither of
these pointers are ever set. Fallback to calling v->type_int() in this third
(default) case.
Signed-off-by: Vasilis Liaskovitis <vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
Message-id:
1375109277-25561-6-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
void visit_type_size(Visitor *v, uint64_t *obj, const char *name, Error **errp)
{
void visit_type_size(Visitor *v, uint64_t *obj, const char *name, Error **errp)
{
if (!error_is_set(errp)) {
if (!error_is_set(errp)) {
- (v->type_size ? v->type_size : v->type_uint64)(v, obj, name, errp);
+ if (v->type_size) {
+ v->type_size(v, obj, name, errp);
+ } else if (v->type_uint64) {
+ v->type_uint64(v, obj, name, errp);
+ } else {
+ value = *obj;
+ v->type_int(v, &value, name, errp);
+ *obj = value;
+ }