sysctl_ip_prot_sock is accessed concurrently, and there is always a chance
of data-race. So, all readers and writers need some basic protection to
avoid load/store-tearing.
Fixes:
4548b683b781 ("Introduce a sysctl that modifies the value of PROT_SOCK.")
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
static inline bool inet_port_requires_bind_service(struct net *net, unsigned short port)
{
static inline bool inet_port_requires_bind_service(struct net *net, unsigned short port)
{
- return port < net->ipv4.sysctl_ip_prot_sock;
+ return port < READ_ONCE(net->ipv4.sysctl_ip_prot_sock);
* port limit.
*/
if ((range[1] < range[0]) ||
* port limit.
*/
if ((range[1] < range[0]) ||
- (range[0] < net->ipv4.sysctl_ip_prot_sock))
+ (range[0] < READ_ONCE(net->ipv4.sysctl_ip_prot_sock)))
ret = -EINVAL;
else
set_local_port_range(net, range);
ret = -EINVAL;
else
set_local_port_range(net, range);
.extra2 = &ip_privileged_port_max,
};
.extra2 = &ip_privileged_port_max,
};
- pports = net->ipv4.sysctl_ip_prot_sock;
+ pports = READ_ONCE(net->ipv4.sysctl_ip_prot_sock);
ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(&tmp, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(&tmp, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
if (range[0] < pports)
ret = -EINVAL;
else
if (range[0] < pports)
ret = -EINVAL;
else
- net->ipv4.sysctl_ip_prot_sock = pports;
+ WRITE_ONCE(net->ipv4.sysctl_ip_prot_sock, pports);