+
+/* Return TRUE if we can determine whether FRAG2 OFF2 appears after
+ (strict >, not >=) FRAG1 OFF1, assuming it is not before. Set
+ *OFFSET so that resolve_expression will resolve an O_gt operation
+ between them to false (0) if they are guaranteed to be at the same
+ location, or to true (-1) if they are guaranteed to be at different
+ locations. Return FALSE conservatively, e.g. if neither result can
+ be guaranteed (yet).
+
+ They are known to be in the same segment, and not the same frag
+ (this is a fallback for frag_offset_fixed_p, that always takes care
+ of this case), and it is expected (from the uses this is designed
+ to simplify, namely location view increments) that frag2 is
+ reachable from frag1 following the fr_next links, rather than the
+ other way round. */
+
+bfd_boolean
+frag_gtoffset_p (valueT off2, const fragS *frag2,
+ valueT off1, const fragS *frag1, offsetT *offset)
+{
+ /* Insanity check. */
+ if (frag2 == frag1 || off1 > frag1->fr_fix)
+ return FALSE;
+
+ /* If the first symbol offset is at the end of the first frag and
+ the second symbol offset at the beginning of the second frag then
+ it is possible they are at the same address. Go looking for a
+ non-zero fr_fix in any frag between these frags. If found then
+ we can say the O_gt result will be true. If no such frag is
+ found we assume that frag1 or any of the following frags might
+ have a variable tail and thus the answer is unknown. This isn't
+ strictly true; some frags don't have a variable tail, but it
+ doesn't seem worth optimizing for those cases. */
+ const fragS *frag = frag1;
+ offsetT delta = off2 - off1;
+ for (;;)
+ {
+ delta += frag->fr_fix;
+ frag = frag->fr_next;
+ if (frag == frag2)
+ {
+ if (delta == 0)
+ return FALSE;
+ break;
+ }
+ /* If we run off the end of the frag chain then we have a case
+ where frag2 is not after frag1, ie. an O_gt expression not
+ created for .loc view. */
+ if (frag == NULL)
+ return FALSE;
+ }
+
+ *offset = (off2 - off1 - delta) * OCTETS_PER_BYTE;
+ return TRUE;
+}