c: C2x typeof
C2x adds typeof as a standard feature. In general this follows
existing GNU C semantics very closely, but there are various ways in
which the implementation involves more than simply enabling the
keyword for C2x:
* As well as typeof, there is a typeof_unqual variant, which removes
all qualifiers and _Atomic from the resulting type (whereas typeof
preserves qualifiers and _Atomic on qualified or atomic (lvalue or
type name) operands).
* The typeof keyword is disabled by -fno-asm, so enabling it for C2x
needs to be implemented in a way that preserves the disabling by
-fno-asm for older standard versions (which having -fno-asm having
no effect on it in C2x mode). This is done via adding a new D_EXT11
mask (which is also where the C++ front-end change comes from, to
handle D_EXT11 appropriately there for -fno-asm and
-fno-gnu-keywords).
* GNU typeof treats the noreturn property of a function (as specified
in standard C with _Noreturn or [[noreturn]]) as being part of the
type of a pointer to function, but it is not part of the type in
standard terms. Thus a special case is needed in the typeof
implementation, just like in the _Generic implementation, to avoid
treating it as a type for standard typeof. It seems plausible this
is being used when copying the type of one object to another using
typeof, so the existing semantics are preserved for __typeof__, and
for typeof in pre-C2x modes, while typeof for C2x or later has the
standard semantics.
* It turns out that, even after Martin Uecker's changes in this area,
there were still cases where rvalues could wrongly have a qualified
or atomic type in GCC. This applied to ++ and -- increment and
decrement expressions, and also to calls to functions returning an
atomic type. (For the latter, the working draft doesn't actually
explicitly exclude the function call expression having an atomic
type, but given all the changes that have gone into C17 and C2x to
avoid rvalues ever having qualified types, and given that
lvalue-to-rvalue conversion removes both qualifiers and _Atomic, it
seems unlikely that this (or casts, where GCC already removes
_Atomic) is actually intended as a route to allow an
_Atomic-qualified rvalue; I've noted this to raise as an NB comment
on the CD ballot.)
Bootstrapped with no regressions for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK to
commit (C+
gcc/
* doc/invoke.texi (-fno-asm): Update description of effects on
typeof keyword.
gcc/c-family/
* c-common.cc (c_common_reswords): Mark typeof as D_EXT11. Add
typeof_unqual.
* c-common.h (enum rid): Add RID_TYPEOF_UNQUAL.
(D_EXT11): New macro. Values of subsequent macros updated.
gcc/c/
* c-parser.cc (c_parse_init): Add D_EXT11 to mask if flag_no_asm
and not C2x.
(c_keyword_starts_typename, c_token_starts_declspecs)
(c_parser_declspecs, c_parser_objc_selector): Handle
RID_TYPEOF_UNQUAL.
(c_parser_typeof_specifier): Handle RID_TYPEOF_UNQUAL.
Distinguish typeof for C2x from __typeof__ for all standard
versions and typeof before C2x.
* c-typeck.cc (build_function_call_vec): Use unqualified version
of non-void return type.
(build_unary_op): Use unqualified type for increment and
decrement.
gcc/cp/
* lex.cc (init_reswords): Handle D_EXT11.
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.dg/c11-typeof-1.c, gcc.dg/c2x-typeof-1.c,
gcc.dg/c2x-typeof-2.c, gcc.dg/c2x-typeof-3.c,
gcc.dg/gnu11-typeof-1.c, gcc.dg/gnu11-typeof-2.c,
gcc.dg/gnu2x-typeof-1.c: New tests.
13 files changed: