[DAGCombiner][X86] When promoting loads don't use ZEXTLOAD even its legal

[DAGCombiner][X86] When promoting loads don't use ZEXTLOAD even its legal

We were previously prefering ZEXTLOAD over EXTLOAD if it is legal. This triggers during X86's promotion of i16->i32. Not sure about other targets.

Using ZEXTLOAD can prevent folding it to SEXTLOAD later if we were to promote a sign extended operand like we would need for SRA. However, X86 doesn't currently promote i16 SRA. I was looking into doing that which is how I found this issue.

This is also blocking our ability to fold 4 byte aligned EXTLOADs with "loadi32". This is what caused most of the test changes here.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45585#inline-402825

llvm-svn: 330781