gem_lut_handle: Make the error checking explicit for LUT handling
authorChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Wed, 5 Jun 2013 10:10:04 +0000 (11:10 +0100)
committerChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Wed, 5 Jun 2013 10:14:25 +0000 (11:14 +0100)
commitf1e9e300fa82181182e2e92ccce078682829a3a2
treef5edf7e16598248b4b2d9e8e166b51012d4ee5ea
parent2e1c11546a4aa69c1e774aaa653bb9d84552e133
gem_lut_handle: Make the error checking explicit for LUT handling

What this test is interested in is the handling of the LUT for very
large arrays, irrespective of whether such batch are actually
executable. So adjust the pass/fail checks to be explicit in the error
they are looking for, so that we do not conflate memory/aperture
pressure as a failure in the LUT API.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65391
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
tests/gem_lut_handle.c