[Sema] Allow static_cast<T&&>(e) to check explicit conversions for non-reference...

[Sema] Allow static_cast<T&&>(e) to check explicit conversions for non-reference-related types.

Summary:
[expr.cast.static] states:
> 3. A glvalue of type “cv1 T1” can be cast to type “rvalue reference to cv2 T2” if “cv2 T2” is reference-compatible
> with “cv1 T1”. The result refers to the object or the specified base class subobject thereof. If T2 is
> an inaccessible or ambiguous base class of T1, a program that necessitates such a cast is
> ill-formed.
>
> 4. Otherwise, an expression e can be explicitly converted to a type T using a static_cast of the form static_-
> cast<T>(e) if the declaration T t(e); is well-formed, for some invented temporary variable t. [...]

Currently when checking p3 Clang will diagnose `static_cast<T&&>(e)` as invalid if the argument is not reference compatible with `T`. However I believe the correct behavior is to also check p4 in those cases.  For example:

```
double y = 42;
static_cast<int&&>(y); // this should be OK.  'int&& t(y)' is well formed
```

Note that we still don't check p4 for non-reference-compatible types which are reference-related since  `T&& t(e);` should never be well formed in those cases.

Reviewers: rsmith

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26231

llvm-svn: 285872