README and the beginning of the first code-review. Here's the README:
authorErik Walthinsen <omega@temple-baptist.org>
Sun, 17 Dec 2000 06:26:30 +0000 (06:26 +0000)
committerErik Walthinsen <omega@temple-baptist.org>
Sun, 17 Dec 2000 06:26:30 +0000 (06:26 +0000)
commite40c2845726697d397e33086d3073e8293332ec3
tree1d103bddb80e4436fefdee1dd4f1fcf5ab483763
parent4e1875f826d930e40a3a50076b4337ac032acfbd
README and the beginning of the first code-review.  Here's the README:

Original commit message from CVS:
README and the beginning of the first code-review.  Here's the README:

Code reviews:
=============

Files are to be named by file or subsystem, and CVS revision number or date:

gstbin.c-1.41
editor-20001216

A file should look something like the following:

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Code Review
===========
File: gst/gstbin.c
Revision: 1.41
Date: Dec 16, 2000
Reviewer: Erik Walthinsen <omega@cse.ogi.edu>

-----
Line 20:
#define GST_DEBUG_ENABLED

Shouldn't be here, DEBUG should be enabled globally.  May leave until
scheduling changes are done.

-----
Line 117: (gst_bin_class_init)
gstelement_class->elementfactory =    gst_elementfactory_find("bin");

Not sure this is such a great idea.  I thought the GstElement code did this
kind of stuff?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

The format will evolve as we do more stuff, such as putting in fields for
recommended actions, comments regarding any later changes made and when, etc.
docs/code-reviews/README [new file with mode: 0644]
docs/code-reviews/gstbin.c-1.41 [new file with mode: 0644]