Replacing (raster_block >> tx_size) with (block >> (tx_size << 1)).
authorDmitry Kovalev <dkovalev@google.com>
Thu, 7 Nov 2013 02:51:01 +0000 (18:51 -0800)
committerDmitry Kovalev <dkovalev@google.com>
Thu, 7 Nov 2013 23:26:57 +0000 (15:26 -0800)
commitd28f30ef4e69d6217f20b758a1e2a14a1c7f3b98
tree74f1889cf1a8b69d96d19a4872297aa44ff8e979
parenta6462990e6cd42bfe1a02dd6c452dddde0902f28
Replacing (raster_block >> tx_size) with (block >> (tx_size << 1)).

The new expression is much more logical than previous one. Surprisingly
both expressions give exactly the same set of dependent values
-- have_top, have_left, have_right -- in vp9_predict_intra_block.

Change-Id: I63eb1b592b8c37883b3a0dbb1f3daa271e446109
vp9/decoder/vp9_decodframe.c