ftrace: arm64: remove static ftrace

ftrace: arm64: remove static ftrace

The build test robot pointer out that there's a build failure when:

  CONFIG_HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS=y
  CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS=n

... due to some mismatched ifdeffery, some of which checks
CONFIG_HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS, and some of which checks
CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS, leading to some missing definitions expected
by the core code when CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE=n and consequently
CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS=n.

There's really not much point in supporting CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE=n (AKA
static ftrace). All supported toolchains allow us to implement
DYNAMIC_FTRACE, distributions all prefer DYNAMIC_FTRACE, and both
powerpc and s390 removed support for static ftrace in commits:

  0c0c52306f4792a4 ("powerpc: Only support DYNAMIC_FTRACE not static")
  5d6a0163494c78ad ("s390/ftrace: enforce DYNAMIC_FTRACE if FUNCTION_TRACER is selected")

... and according to Steven, static ftrace is only supported on x86 to
allow testing that the core code still functions in this configuration.

Given that, let's simplify matters by removing arm64's support for
static ftrace. This avoids the problem originally reported, and leaves
us with less code to maintain.

Fixes: 26299b3f6ba2 ("ftrace: arm64: move from REGS to ARGS")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202211212249.livTPi3Y-lkp@intel.com
Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221122163624.1225912-1-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>