[X86] Don't lie about legality to TLI's demanded bits.
authorAhmed Bougacha <ahmed.bougacha@gmail.com>
Thu, 27 Jul 2017 21:28:59 +0000 (21:28 +0000)
committerAhmed Bougacha <ahmed.bougacha@gmail.com>
Thu, 27 Jul 2017 21:28:59 +0000 (21:28 +0000)
commitc8909937269d665970eb98b9580e779e25b7e68b
tree63f1adb815e530f9ef0a60996e4f47faf2bda869
parent52cecb1f27f1c3b08a538f9be3adf9b14b205846
[X86] Don't lie about legality to TLI's demanded bits.

Like r309323, X86 had a typo where it passed the wrong flags to TLO.

Found by inspection; I haven't been able to tickle this into having
observable behavior.  I don't think it does, given that X86 doesn't have
custom demanded bits logic, and the generic logic doesn't have a lot of
exposure to illegal constructs.

llvm-svn: 309325
llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp