Revert "Allow returning of temps and ro’s from lv subs"

Revert "Allow returning of temps and ro’s from lv subs"

This reverts commit b724cc14b25929aee44eee20bd26102cceb520b6.

Lvalue subroutines are more of a mess than I realised when I made
that commit.

I just tried removing the syntactical restriction on what the last
statement or the argument to return can be in an lvalue sub. It opened
a whole can of worms.

PADTMPs are bizarre creatures that have somewhat erratic behaviour.
Since assigning to a PADTMP is almost always a mistake (since the
value will definitely be discarded), those *should* be disallowed,
when the sub is called in lvalue context. That also avoids propagating
a whole load of bugs when referencing PADTMPs, aliasing to them, etc.

Read-only scalars end up triggering a ‘Modification of a read-only
value attempted’ message without the restrictions in pp_leavesublv,
but the message the latter was providing (which this revert restores)
is clearer (‘Can't return a readonly value from lvalue subroutine’).

Speaking of lvalue context, there are three types of context with
regard to lvalue-ness (orthogonal to the usual void/scalar/list
contexts):
• rvalue context ($x = func())
• lvalue context (func() = $x)
• semi-lvalue context (\func())

Each is handle by a separate code path in pp_leavesublv:
• rvalue context - any value can be returned; it’s copied (waste-
  ful, perhaps?)
• semi-lvalue context - any value can be returned; it’s not copied
• lvalue context - stringent rules about what can and cannot be
  returned (which this revert restores)

So it is perfectly fine to restrict what can be returned from an
lvalue sub *in true lvalue context*, without affected rvalue use.

Now, regarding TEMPs, although this commit restores the restriction on
returning TEMPs, a forthcoming commit will relax that restriction once
more, since it causes bugs.