bridge: is PACKET_LOOPBACK unlikely()?
authorSimon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Sun, 22 Aug 2010 17:35:32 +0000 (17:35 +0000)
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Mon, 23 Aug 2010 04:09:04 +0000 (21:09 -0700)
commitc2368e795cec561229ef66a04ac51629b918a9e8
tree2fd08484e8948dc2969ac2d01b00af175b93abb5
parentfcb12fd2236f49aa8fdc1568ed4ebdfe4fddc6b5
bridge: is PACKET_LOOPBACK unlikely()?

While looking at using netdev_rx_handler_register for openvswitch Jesse
Gross suggested that an unlikely() might be worthwhile in that code.
I'm interested to see if its appropriate for the bridge code.

Cc: Jesse Gross <jesse@nicira.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
net/bridge/br_input.c