Improve coverage of the apple-tables test
authorPavel Labath <labath@google.com>
Mon, 21 May 2018 10:09:22 +0000 (10:09 +0000)
committerPavel Labath <labath@google.com>
Mon, 21 May 2018 10:09:22 +0000 (10:09 +0000)
commitbecc204633c2f4b67df1a2f8892116777be8c575
treef2eb74f110c56dbc0439d21ca3c71dcd51d5178d
parent5aa7cdfd7094b9f26be87153f5c7eb236b98507f
Improve coverage of the apple-tables test

After closer examination, it turns out we mis-classify one of the
methods only if two of the structs have the same name. Since this was
meant to be a basic test, I rename one of the structs in the test so
that we have at least some coverage for the apple tables lookup.
Instead, I create an XFAILed test which specifically targets the
same-name case (and file a bug to track it).

llvm-svn: 332833
lldb/lit/SymbolFile/DWARF/find-basic-function.cpp
lldb/lit/SymbolFile/DWARF/find-method-local-struct.cpp [new file with mode: 0644]