i965/batch: Ensure we use a consistent offset in relocs
In theory gcc is free to re-load them, and if a concurrent
execbuf races and updates bo->offset64 then we have a problem:
execbuffer api requires that the ->presumed_offset and the one
we used for the reloc matches. It does not require that the value
is sensible, which means no locks needed, just a consistent load.
Ken said his next series will nuke this, so just hand-roll the
kernel's READ_ONCE idea inline.
FIXME: Most callers of brw_emit_reloc recompute the relocation
themselves, which means this doesn't really fix the race. But the long
term plan is to move to per-context relocation handling, which will
fix this all properly. So leave this for now as just a reminder.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>