drivers/ata: Replace spin_unlock_wait() with lock/unlock pair
authorPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Thu, 29 Jun 2017 20:10:47 +0000 (13:10 -0700)
committerPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Thu, 17 Aug 2017 15:08:58 +0000 (08:08 -0700)
commita4f08141d0b876407ca4e4b0ae1b2dec35851532
treeaee8baf463c6af954a7ba76b070800795651b60c
parente0892e086aae8d86e33dc8fb87f3d36c901df574
drivers/ata: Replace spin_unlock_wait() with lock/unlock pair

There is no agreed-upon definition of spin_unlock_wait()'s semantics,
and it appears that all callers could do just as well with a lock/unlock
pair.  This commit therefore eliminates the spin_unlock_wait() call and
associated else-clause and hoists the then-clause's lock and unlock out of
the "if" statement.  This should be safe from a performance perspective
because according to Tejun there should be few if any drivers that don't
set their own error handler.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
drivers/ata/libata-eh.c