ARM: 8160/1: drop warning about return_address not using unwind tables
The warning was introduced in 2009 (commit
4bf1fa5a34aa ([ARM] 5613/1:
implement CALLER_ADDRESSx)). The only "problem" here is that
CALLER_ADDRESSx for x > 1 returns NULL which doesn't do much harm.
The drawback of implementing a fix (i.e. use unwind tables to implement CALLER_ADDRESSx) is that much of the unwinder code would need to be marked as not
traceable.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
[sw0312.kim: cherry-pick from mainline to remove build warning.]
Signed-off-by: Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@samsung.com>
Change-Id: Ifd4a14efb9f891abca8e3da0a65f0635160356e8