tty_ldisc: add more limits to the @write_wakeup
In the uart_handle_cts_change(), uart_write_wakeup() is called after
we call @uart_port->ops->start_tx().
The Documentation/serial/driver tells us:
-----------------------------------------------
start_tx(port)
Start transmitting characters.
Locking: port->lock taken.
Interrupts: locally disabled.
-----------------------------------------------
So when the uart_write_wakeup() is called, the port->lock is taken by
the upper. See the following callstack:
|_ uart_write_wakeup
|_ tty_wakeup
|_ ld->ops->write_wakeup
With the port->lock held, we call the @write_wakeup. Some implemetation of
the @write_wakeup does not notice that the port->lock is held, and it still
tries to send data with uart_write() which will try to grab the prot->lock.
A dead lock occurs, see the following log caught in the Bluetooth by uart:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
BUG: spinlock lockup suspected on CPU#0, swapper/0/0
lock: 0xdc3f4410, .magic:
dead4ead, .owner: swapper/0/0, .owner_cpu: 0
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W 3.10.17-16839-ge4a1bef #1320
[<
80014cbc>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x138) from [<
8001251c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[<
8001251c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) from [<
802816ac>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0x108/0x184)
[<
802816ac>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0x108/0x184) from [<
806a22b0>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x54/0x60)
[<
806a22b0>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x54/0x60) from [<
802f5754>] (uart_write+0x38/0xe0)
[<
802f5754>] (uart_write+0x38/0xe0) from [<
80455270>] (hci_uart_tx_wakeup+0xa4/0x168)
[<
80455270>] (hci_uart_tx_wakeup+0xa4/0x168) from [<
802dab18>] (tty_wakeup+0x50/0x5c)
[<
802dab18>] (tty_wakeup+0x50/0x5c) from [<
802f81a4>] (imx_rtsint+0x50/0x80)
[<
802f81a4>] (imx_rtsint+0x50/0x80) from [<
802f88f4>] (imx_int+0x158/0x17c)
[<
802f88f4>] (imx_int+0x158/0x17c) from [<
8007abe0>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0x50/0x194)
[<
8007abe0>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0x50/0x194) from [<
8007ad60>] (handle_irq_event+0x3c/0x5c)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This patch adds more limits to the @write_wakeup, the one who wants to
implemet the @write_wakeup should follow the limits which avoid the deadlock.
Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>