netfilter: x_tables: don't move to non-existent next rule

netfilter: x_tables: don't move to non-existent next rule

commit f24e230d257af1ad7476c6e81a8dc3127a74204e upstream.

Ben Hawkes says:

 In the mark_source_chains function (net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c) it
 is possible for a user-supplied ipt_entry structure to have a large
 next_offset field. This field is not bounds checked prior to writing a
 counter value at the supplied offset.

Base chains enforce absolute verdict.

User defined chains are supposed to end with an unconditional return,
xtables userspace adds them automatically.

But if such return is missing we will move to non-existent next rule.

CVE-2016-3134

Reported-by: Ben Hawkes <hawkes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: Chas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
[sw0312.kim: cherry-pick from linux-3.10.y to fix CVE-2016-3134]
Signed-off-by: Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@samsung.com>
Change-Id: I7761470b085f73e78ce7aa0c02f5c377a100b6a4