drm/dp_mst: Correct the bug in drm_dp_update_payload_part1()

drm/dp_mst: Correct the bug in drm_dp_update_payload_part1()

commit e5a6ca27eb72c67533ddfc11c06df84beaa167fa upstream.

[Why]
If the payload_state is DP_PAYLOAD_DELETE_LOCAL in series, current
code doesn't delete the payload at current index and just move the
index to next one after shuffling payloads.

[How]
Drop the i++ increasing part in for loop head and decide whether
to increase the index or not according to payload_state of current
payload.

Changes since v1:
* Refine the code to have it easy reading
* Amend the commit message to meet the way code is modified now.

Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Fixes: 706246c761dd ("drm/dp_mst: Refactor drm_dp_update_payload_part1()")
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Juston Li <juston.li@intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.1+
[Added cc for stable]
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191203042423.5961-1-Wayne.Lin@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>