Followup to revision 364545: Turns out that clang issues different errors for C+...
authorMarshall Clow <mclow.lists@gmail.com>
Thu, 27 Jun 2019 15:37:31 +0000 (15:37 +0000)
committerMarshall Clow <mclow.lists@gmail.com>
Thu, 27 Jun 2019 15:37:31 +0000 (15:37 +0000)
commit7d8274d54d0305b827e87adae4619abd6433043c
treeb446c2929f170de679963c95632e4bc58489da18
parentd6a46aff59134d54ab5e81d93dcf337734568884
Followup to revision 364545: Turns out that clang issues different errors for C++11 vs c++2a, so I tweaked the 'expected-error' bits that I added to match either of them.

llvm-svn: 364554
libcxx/test/std/strings/basic.string.hash/char_type_hash.fail.cpp
libcxx/test/std/strings/string.view/string.view.hash/char_type.hash.fail.cpp