bpf, docs: s/eBPF/BPF in standards documents
authorDavid Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Mon, 28 Aug 2023 15:59:48 +0000 (10:59 -0500)
committerDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Wed, 30 Aug 2023 14:36:10 +0000 (16:36 +0200)
commit7d35eb1a184a3f0759ad9e9cde4669b5c55b2063
tree221d094e484f4274e90320a9e1936b36ff194e44
parentdeb88407254621bf926658cff49a7ba01b59dec6
bpf, docs: s/eBPF/BPF in standards documents

There isn't really anything other than just "BPF" at this point,
so referring to it as "eBPF" in our standards document just causes
unnecessary confusion. Let's just be consistent and use "BPF".

Suggested-by: Will Hawkins <hawkinsw@obs.cr>
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230828155948.123405-4-void@manifault.com
Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst